Our
thanks goes to Glenys Bolland for locating and transcribing this
interesting document. It is a court case from 1816 involving Mary
Hobkirk, the widow and her son Samuel Hobkirk as two of the defendants
to a complaint filed by her two sons William & Adam Hobkirk, along
with John Vale and Henry Lees. To view a copy of the original document, go here.
The transcription is as follows:
[ex National Archives, UK. A2A. Document Reference(s): C 13/2496 ]
Without oath, by order dated 20th January, 1816.
The joint and several answer of Mary
Hobkirk, widow and Samuel Hobkirk, two of the defendants to the bill of
Complaint of William Hobkirk, John Vale, Henry Lees and Adam Hobkirk,
complainants.
These defendants, saving and reserving
to themselves now and at all times hereafter all benefit and advantage
of exception that can or may be had, or taken to the said complainants
said Bill of Complaint for answer thereto, or unto so much thereof as
they are advised is in any wise material or necessary for them to make
answer unto jointly and severally answer and say they admit it to be
true that Adam Hobkirk, deceased, in the complainants Bill of Complaint
for answer thereto or unto so much thereof as they are advised is in
any wise material or necessary for them to make answer and say they
admit it to be true that Adam Hobkirk, deceased, in the complainants
Bill named, was at the time of making his Will in the said Bill
mentioned and of his death, possessed of, or well entitled to such Bank
Annuities as are mentioned in the said Bill and that the same were at
the time of his death, standing in his name in the books of the
Governor and company of the Bank of England and that he was also
possessed of or entitled to some other personal estate consisting of
Divers particulars and these defendants further admit it to be true
that the said Adam Hobkirk departed this life at or about the time
mentioned in the said complainants Bill in that behalf and that he
before his death, duly made and published his last Will and Testament
in writing of such date and to such purport and effect as in that
behalf mentioned and set forth in the said complainants Bill so far as
the same is therein set forth and that he did thereby appoint this
defendant, Mary Hobkirk, and John West and Aneas Barclay in the said
Bill respectively named in that behalf Executrix and Executors of his
said Will and this defendant Mary Hobkirk admits and this other
defendant believes it to be true that she, this defendant, on or about
the 16th day of September, one thousand eight hundred and nine, alone
duly proved the said testators said Will in the prerogative Court of
the Archbishop of Canterbury and took upon herself the burthen (sic) of
the execution thereof, power being reserved to the said John West and
Aneas Barclay to go in and prove the same when they should be minded
and desirous of so doing, but these defendants believe they have not
yet done so and that they have no intention of so doing and this
defendant, Mary Hobkirk, admits and this other defendant believes it to
be true that she, this defendant, Mary Hobkirk, did under and by virtue
of the said Will or the probate thereof possess herself of all the
personal estate and effects of the said testator and that she hath
there out paid and satisfied all the funeral and testamentary expenses
of the said testator and all his debts which have come to her knowledge
and also all the specific and pecuniary legacies given and bequeathed
by his said Will; and that she, this defendant, hath divided the
residue thereof save as in the said Bill in that behalf stated between
the complainants William Hobkirk and Adam Hobkirk and this defendant
Samuel Hobkirk in equal shares and proportions pursuant to the
directions contained in the said Will in that behalf and that this
defendant, Mary Hobkirk, hath reserved the sum of twenty-two thousand
pounds, Bank three percentum consolidated annuities belonging to the
said testator and which formed part and is the only remaining part of
the residue of his personal estate and effects for the purposes in that
behalf mentioned in the said Bill; and that the said sum of twenty-two
thousand pounds Bank three percentum annuities hath ever since the
death of the said testator, been, and now is, standing in the name of
the said testator in the books of the Governor and company of the Bank
of England; and these defendants further say it may be true for
anything they know to the contrary; that the said complainant, William
Hobkirk, may under the circumstances mentioned in the said Bill in that
behalf have executed such bond or obligation to John … Wheatstone,
named in the said Bill in that behalf of such date and to such purport
or effect as is in that behalf mentioned and set forth in the said
Bill, such indenture may have been made and executed of such date
between such parties and to such purport and effect as in that behalf
is mentioned and set forth in the said Bill so far as the same is
therein set forth and that the said John … Wheatstone may under the
circumstances in that behalf mentioned in the said Bill have caused the
said Bond or obligation to be put up to sale and that the said
complainant, John Vale, may have been thereupon declared the purchaser
of the same and may have paid to the said complainant, William Hobkirk,
the sum of three hundred and ninety-five pounds for such bond and that
on the occasion mentioned in the said Bill such indenture as is
mentioned in the said Bill to bear date the 30th day of June, one
thousand, eight hundred and fifteen, may have been made and executed by
and between such parties and to such purport and effect as is mentioned
and set forth in that behalf in the said complainants bill, so far as
the same is therein set forth, but these defendants say they are
strangers to, and utterly ignorant of all the several last mentioned
matters and things except by the statements contained in the said Bill
in regard thereto and they therefore crave leave to refer to such proof
thereof as the said complainants may make and these defendants say they
have not any interest in such matters and they submit the same to the
judgment of this Honourable court and these defendants say they claim
no other interest in the said sum of twenty-two thousand pounds three
percentum consolidated Bank annuities than that this defendant Mary
Hobkirk claims to be entitled to an annuity of two hundred pounds
arising there out for her life and this defendant Samuel Hobkirk claims
to be entitled to one third part of the said twenty-two thousand pounds
three percentum consolidated bank annuities on her death and in the
mean time, subject to the said annuity and also subject to the payment
of the said two other annuities of ten pounds and ten pounds bequeathed
by the said testator’s Will, to his sister and brother, Margaret
Hobkirk and Walter Hobkirk in the said complainants Bill named who are
as these defendants believe both of them living, and now residing in
North Britain, out of the jurisdiction of this honourable court and
these defendants say they are strangers to all other the matters and
things mentioned in the said complainants Bill and they deny all and
all manner of unlawful combination and confederacy where with they are
charged without that that there there is any other matter or thing in
the said complainant’s said Bill contained material or effectual in the
law whatsoever for them these defendants to make answer unto and not
herein and hereby well and sufficiently answered unto confessed or
avoided traversed or denied is true to the knowledge and belief of them
these defendants all which matters and things these defendants are
ready and willing to aver, maintain and prove as this Honourable Court
shall direct and humbly pray to be hence dismissed with their
reasonable costs and charges in this behalf most wrongfully
sustained.
Signed by the said Mary Hobkirk in the presence
of Theodore ?Grimmett of Cheltenham, Gloucestershire,
Solicitor
Signed by the said Samuel Hobkirk in the presence
of Smith … of ?Plymouth ?Devonshire, solicitor
Return to Hobkirk family page
This page was last updated 28 May 2012